• galoisghost
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    9 months ago

    The main thing I got from this article is just how many mediocre movies win awards.

    • dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’ve heard it argued that Oscars should be given for films from five years earlier so there can be some realistic assessment of their actual impact on culture.

      My key example is The English Patient, which beat (among others) Fargo. TEP was forgotten within 6 months, Fargo’s influence is massive. (Full disclosure, I think the Coens deserve Oscar’s for at least three of their films.)

      • livus@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        9 months ago

        Oscars aren’t about cultural impact though or Dude Where’s My Car would have one.

        Oscars are about industry politics.

        (Also I think The English Patient is a very good film and that Oscar helped Minghuella get The Talented Mr Ripley off the ground. How’s the peeping Tommy).

        • 50MYT
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Dude where’s my car winning an Oscar…

          Next up

          #Ass

      • admiralteal@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        The often-cited example is Slumdog Millionaire winning over Benjamin Button, Frost/Nixon, Milk, and The Reader when The Dark Knight wasn’t even nominated.

        Superhero movies aren’t for everyone for sure, but there is absolutely zero question that The Dark Knight was one of the most influential movies of all time. Even the academy sort of admitted it was a mistake by adjusting some of their nomination rules afterward.