• tristan
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’m no expert by any means but I think once he’s kicked out of NY, it’s going to be pretty difficult for him to get back in.

    He also has the court appointed monitor for the next 3 years which he already complained is costing him money (by stopping him from committing more fraud).

    On top of that, banks will think twice before doing business with him in the future making it very difficult for him to make money without risking what he already has

    While I agree that it should have been much more, I think (well more of a hope) that the long term damage this will do will cost him and his family far more than if he never committed fraud in the first place… Then again, he’s shown an amazing ability to avoid consequences this far

    • Boddhisatva@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      He hasn’t really been kicked out, though. Has he? He’s banned from “serving as an officer or director of any New York corporation or other legal entity in New York for a period of three years” but the business certificates were not cancelled. The judge modified his original order from September to vacate the directive to cancel them. That means that when the monitor, who Trump is paying about $186,000/month, is done in three years, he’ll be back in control of it all.

      • tristan
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        5 months ago

        Oh… I misunderstood that part then, I thought that part of the order was still in place. That’s not as bad for him. My hope is that the monitor digs up a lot more dirt in that time and hands it over, like they did a month or so back

      • Natanael@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        He’s not allowed to control or direct the company for those 3 years, and the sum of the judgment might be enough to force the company to be sold off

        • Boddhisatva@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          4 months ago

          Maybe, but somehow I don’t think it’ll play out that way.

          I think one of two things will happen with the businesses. First, it may turn out that they owe so much because of the fraudulently acquired loans that they are not really profitable and will end up failing. They simply might not viable without the ongoing fraud. It’ll get particularly dicey if the banks Trump and his companies defrauded decide to use the ruling to demand that the loans be immediately repaid. I doubt that will happen, but it’d be fun to watch.

          On the other hand, Trump is such a bone head businessman that he could actually be richer if he’d just invested his inheritance in the stock market and not started his own businesses. This is a guy who managed to bankrupt multiple casinos. The saying, the house always wins, apparently doesn’t apply when Trump is running the house. Without his tiny, incompetent hands at the wheel, his companies might actually start running more efficiently. Whoever will be running them instead of Trump may just do a better job than him, since they won’t be so focused on committing crimes. Trump could actually make more money from them than he would otherwise.