• ⸻ Ban DHMO 🇦🇺 ⸻OPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    7 months ago

    If they suspect you (or not) should they be able to do that? Treating your employees like foreign spies seems a tad unethical to me

    • spiffmeister
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      “if you’ve got nothing to hide, you’ve got nothing to fear” was always BS.

      • OmanMkII
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        The short answer for this is that an employer probably doesn’t give a shit about you watching youtube at work, but what they (by they, their IT/security teams) do care about is your account logging in from a new geolocation, or clicking a risky link in an unusual email. If the employer logs everything that occurs (which is required by a lot of areas such as PCI DSS for electronic payment) they can track who’s account was compromised, how it happened, exactly what was done by the actor, and how far it’s spread across the network - if at all. If no logs are kept, then it may as well have never happened.

        ETA: there’s a large difference between mouse tracking mentioned by the article and logging though, the former is rather unethical and I’d hope that it’s never used in the name of security, I sure can’t think of a use.

    • Marin_Rider
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      never said I agree with it, there are ways to avoid it though