• TheHolm
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    From top of my head they are 3.8% of population. So they should be heard for that 3.8%. And about Ignored, I’m not claiming it is wrong, but could you please provide some references.

      • TheHolm
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Thanks for link. But article does not explain why they need voice more than any other minor group. There are many groups which was wrong in the past, why they are not getting voice?

        • StorminNorman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Did you read the whole thing? Cos it certainly covers that. Just because you don’t understand it and can’t parse out the relevant information doesn’t mean I haven’t given it to you.

          • TheHolm
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            I did. There is nothing there explaining why they need help in any other way than any other disadvantaged group.

            • StorminNorman@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              Again, your English sucks. The whole article is the reason why. They’re not gonna sit there and compare it to every minority group in Australia you giant cockwomble…

              • TheHolm
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                So homeless for example do not deserve special voice but aboriginals does? Cut this racist shit, if voice was about helping one who in need it will be total different matter.