People are replying to his comment by saying they’re gonna put his approval of them on their resumé.
The wiki page can currently be summed up with “Hamas is responsible because the US says so.”
People are replying to his comment by saying they’re gonna put his approval of them on their resumé.
The wiki page can currently be summed up with “Hamas is responsible because the US says so.”
That thread is itself inconclusive. A video with a whirring then an explosion doesn’t confirm where it came from. The blast crater is inconsistent with an Israeli air strike, which doesn’t mean it wasn’t from one. No-one has been able to independently examine the damage and even the number of casualties is disputed.
There is not enough proof to say who is responsible for this incident. That doesn’t mean Israel isn’t hell bent on the genocide of the Palestinian people.
i would suggest you read this article
Yes. A very reputable source.
and what is your source? CNN? Fox News?
The article is only describing facts. Here have another one.
Mate you’re missing the point. You might trust these sources, but to me they have absolutely no reputation. You may as well post a video of the drunken ramblings of your local homeless guy.
Anyway I was initially responding to a link to a thread from a Washington Post journalist, have seen the Al Jazira video analysis. It’s all inconclusive.
What has a reputation to you then? Seems to me like you’re willing to dismiss the perspective of non-Zionist Jews entirely with a single remark.
Here’s a news website https://truecrimenewsweekly.com/ that’s main concern is Australian Politics do you trust it?
This is obviously a deflection and I don’t know anything about Australian politics, but glancing through the site they seem surprisingly based.