Yeah, they are. The ftc already got their arse handed to them in court, were you not aware?
The CMA did the almost unheard of and walked back from a hard deny to a “please give us something we can call a win so we can keep a bit of dignity when we approve the deal” and the judge even chastised them for what they’ve done.
I wouldn’t expect someone that thinks you can have a monopoly over a single publisher’s game to understand.
You again didn’t answer my question too - so Sony have a monopoly on insomniac games now? If so, why wasn’t that purchase stopped? In fact why are any studio purchases ever approved if every single one creates a monopoly?
Yeah, they are. The ftc already got their arse handed to them in court, were you not aware?
The CMA did the almost unheard of and walked back from a hard deny to a “please give us something we can call a win so we can keep a bit of dignity when we approve the deal” and the judge even chastised them for what they’ve done.
I wouldn’t expect someone that thinks you can have a monopoly over a single publisher’s game to understand.
You again didn’t answer my question too - so Sony have a monopoly on insomniac games now? If so, why wasn’t that purchase stopped? In fact why are any studio purchases ever approved if every single one creates a monopoly?
Yawn, I’m bored of your lack of understanding. A monopoly isn’t binary.
Go learn something ya jabroni
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/v/verticalintegration.asp