A report commissioned by the NSW government and written by former coal lobbyist Cameron O’Reilly is recommending that the NSW government spend hundreds of millions of dollars per year to extend the life of Eraring coal-fired power station beyond its current lifespan.

“NSW climate targets rely heavily on closing coal, and for good reason - it’s the largest source of climate pollution, and the easiest to phase out.”

Current NSW government climate projections rely on emissions from coal power reducing from 49 million tonnes in 2020 to just 9.5 million tonnes in 2030, the equivalent of just one coal power station, down from the current four.

“We cannot imagine a scenario where the NSW government reaches its own inadequate climate targets if they choose to extend the life of Eraring by even one or two years”.

    • Cruxifux@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yes. They won’t. But they should.

      Also a proper violent movement would need to be large to be effective. If there’s like… just you and me willing to be violent, then that just sends us to jail.

      • Deceptichum@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Pretty sure there’s some rather extreme environmentalist groups you can join out there. Good on 'em, although I think they’re going after the wrong targets e.g. frontline workers over ceos.