Thousands of artists are urging the auction house Christie’s to cancel a sale of art created with artificial intelligence, claiming the technology behind the works is committing “mass theft”.

The Augmented Intelligence auction has been described by Christie’s as the first AI-dedicated sale by a major auctioneer and features 20 lots with prices ranging from $10,000 to $250,000 for works by artists including Refik Anadol and the late AI art pioneer Harold Cohen.

  • Pup Biru
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    To suggest a machine neutral network “thinks like a human” is like suggesting a humanoid robot “runs like a human.” It’s true in an incredibly broad sense, but carries so little meaning with it.

    i wasn’t meaning to suggest that it thinks like a human - simply that the processes are similar enough, and humans aren’t non-replicable… in which case there is some process behind creativity, and that process is some sort of input, processing via our neural processes, and some output. the intent was to say that AI having the possibility of creativity shouldn’t be dismissed off-hand just because it’s not human

    If the AI is creative in the same way as a person, then it is a slave.

    is it though? does creativity rely on being able to interpret the concept of freedom? i think creativity can be divorced from a sense of self, and thus any idea of slavery except in the sense of anthropisation from a 3rd party

    but I am against selling it

    why though? if the art is the inspiration and intent, then the prompt is the art and the image itself is only the expression of that inspiration and intent - all are essential parts of the piece

    It’s sad to see an entire industry of workers get replaced by machines,

    agree and disagree there - it’s sad that a huge amount of artists that have devoted their lives to honing their craft are now less able to make money from using their skills… on the other hand, it’s the democratisation of skills. AI art allows more people to communicate their ideas without the need for skill

    • peanuts4life@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      I’m afraid that we seen to disagree on who an artist is and what is a valid moral trade off.

      Is it really the democratization of art? Or the commodification of art?

      Art has, with the exception of extraordinary circumstances, always been democratic. You could at any point pick up a pencil and draw.

      Ai has funneled that skill, critically through theft, into a commodified product, the ai model. Through with they can make huge profits.

      The machine does the art. And, even when run on your local machine the model was almost certainly trained on expensive machines through means you could not personally replicate.

      I find it alarming that people are so willing to celebrate this. It’s like throwing a party that you can buy bottled Nestle water at the grocery store which was taken by immoral means. It’s nice for you, but ultimately just further consolation of power away from individuals.