• Zagorath
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    I like the meme, but I don’t think it actually works. The implication here is that there’s a correlation between confusing correlation with causation and dying. But there isn’t such a correlation. You are statistically equally likely to die either way

    • credo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      THATS THE JOKE

      I see the confusion now. It’s evident in the thread below. Carry on.

      • Zagorath
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        No, it’s not. The joke is that there is a correlation, but that actually correlation doesn’t mean causation. But here we have a situation where there is neither correlation nor causation.

        The problem is that the joke suggests that correlation is when A -> B (or at least it appears as such). Implication (in formal logic) is not the same as correlation.

        • credo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          Sorry to get mathematical…

          P(A∣B)=P(A) iff

          P(B∣A)=P(B) iff

          P(A∩B)=P(A)P(B)

          ->𝐴 and 𝐵 are uncorrelated or independent.

          There is no correlation with events with probability 1

          • tetris11@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            5 days ago

            isn’t that just Bayesian apologist propaganda?
            *jumps in an unlabelled Frequentist van* “Floor it!”

        • FundMECFS@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          6 days ago

          Yup.

          If the rate of dying is 100% for all humans.

          Then the rate of dying for both humans who confuse correlation and causation and those who don’t is 100%. Hence there is no correlation between the confusion and dying. So no one is confusing correlation or causation, because neither are present.

    • snooggums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      You are statistically equally likely to die either way

      That just adds an additional layer to the joke without undermining the intended punchline about people confusing the two.