Yeah I’m struggling a bit. My best interpretation is:
There are 3 axes, Flesh, Divine, Machine. The corners of the triangle are top: (100, 0, ?), bottom left (0, ?, 100), bottom right (0, 100, ?). Figuring out those question marks is the difficult bit. If the axes work at right angles, they’ll all be 50. That feels the most intuitive to me.
But you could also make a very good case for either 0 or 100, by following the axes working at 60°, depending on whether you follow in a clockwise or anticlockwise direction from the axis. One of these two seems to be implied by the triangular grid lines, but there’s no real way to say which.
As an example, the intersection just under the F in Fungi could be (45, 50, 55) if we work at right angles, (30, 30, 40) if it’s 60° clockwise, or (60, 70, 70) if it’s 60° anticlockwise.
Yeah I’m struggling a bit. My best interpretation is:
There are 3 axes, Flesh, Divine, Machine. The corners of the triangle are top: (100, 0, ?), bottom left (0, ?, 100), bottom right (0, 100, ?). Figuring out those question marks is the difficult bit. If the axes work at right angles, they’ll all be 50. That feels the most intuitive to me.
But you could also make a very good case for either 0 or 100, by following the axes working at 60°, depending on whether you follow in a clockwise or anticlockwise direction from the axis. One of these two seems to be implied by the triangular grid lines, but there’s no real way to say which.
As an example, the intersection just under the F in Fungi could be (45, 50, 55) if we work at right angles, (30, 30, 40) if it’s 60° clockwise, or (60, 70, 70) if it’s 60° anticlockwise.