In short:

A Queensland girl sustained significant burns when wind blew sparks onto a jumper purchased from Temu, which ignited “in a split second”.

Temu recalled the jumper for failing to meet mandatory safety standards.

What’s next?

CHOICE is calling for more proactive protections for Australian consumers, in line with international legislation.


“She can’t even watch a candle be lit now on her birthday cake; she screams. Fire scares her.”

The young girl spent eight weeks in hospital in Brisbane undergoing skin graft operations.

She faces another decade of skin grafts as her body grows.

The ACCC said Australian consumer legislation did not contain a “direct prohibition on the supply of unsafe products”.

Since 2005 CHOICE has been calling for the introduction of a general safety provision (GSP), which would legislate a requirement for suppliers to ensure their products were safe before they could be sold to consumers.

“Unfortunately, Australia’s product safety regime is reactive and it can take someone being seriously injured or killed for a product to be recalled,” Mr Kelly said.

“The current reactive, largely voluntary, approach to product safety is clearly not working.”

A 2017 review of Australian consumer law also recommended the introduction of a GSP, saying it would match other OECD countries, including the UK and Canada, which had responded to the proliferation of online shopping platforms.

  • quokka
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    My sister, with great intentions, bought a lot of gifts for us from Temu. They’re all of “instant landfill” quality. Not unexpected. Nothing quite so dangerous as that jumper though.

    Her grandmother must be feeling awful