• ryannathans
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    Read the fucking article ya lazy cunt

    2 Megabits per second at 9.9 miles

    • dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      That’s pretty good given (as far as I know) the main use case for HaLow is for low bandwidth, very low power use cases, like for IoT devices and other things you’d use Zigbee or Z-wave for today, including devices that run for years off a single button cell battery

      • qupada@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        It sounds like you’re thinking of LoRa, another 900MHz radio protocol.

        LoRa has similar bandwidth to Zigbee (125kbps), and as you say is designed for low-power devices running on battery. I have PIR motion sensors at home which have used only around a third of their battery after 2 years.

        Security cameras seems to be a large target market for HaLow though, where you need a couple of megabits at a few hundred metres.

        • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Serious question, why not use current wifi for that kind of distance?

          I know, it’s probably not really easy to make the comparison at this point - power usage is definitely part of that equation. Though the lower bandwidth of this doesn’t seem quite enough for video?

          Edit: I misread the bandwidth as 347kbit, not Mbit. So yea, this looks very promising for video, especially given the limitations of Wifi, plus using less power.