• threeduck
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    There’s a lot of awful things in culture. It was culturally acceptable to slap a women on the bottom for a good job.

    Your argument is “ah well”.

    That’s not a reasonable defense for your objectively immoral actions. You are causing the suffering of sentient life for taste, that makes you immoral. Not to mention the horrible effect your diet has on the planet.

      • threeduck
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Go on, give me a valid defense for western populations killing animals for taste alone.

          • threeduck
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Okay, I believe it is morally reprehensible to kill a sentient being - one that feels fear and does not want to die, solely for pleasure. Eating meat is immoral and in a just world, would be punishable.

              • threeduck
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                Sentience means “the capacity to have feelings”, and it is widely understood by the scientific community that the vast majority of the animal kingdom has sentience.

                Do you believe cows can experience pain? Because we’re right up close against rejecting scientific consensus just to justify immoral actions. And that typically is frowned upon historically.

                Subjecting something that feels pain to experience pain for your pleasure is immoral.

                • linkhidalgogato@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  honestly i got sentience and sapience confused English isnt my first language, anyways point is it really doesnt matter that they feel pain that in no way affects this, and u know that it doesnt because if farm animals were first sedated before being killed it would not make u ok with it so stop being disingenuous.

                  • threeduck
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 month ago

                    You’re right. If farm animals were sedated before being killed, it would certainly be preferable, but wouldn’t make it right.

                    We have no right to cause pain, fear or death to sentient beings, purely for ~15 minutes or pleasure. Doing so is immoral. There is no valid argument against this. Trust me, I did NOT want to be a vegan. I argued against it for four years trying not to become one. But there was and is no argument against it. Eating meat is immoral, bad for the planet, bad for the animals, bad for modern medicine, and in a typical western diet, bad for your health.

                    I repeat, there is no argument against veganism, and being vegan is objectively he correct moral choice.