• threeduck
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Go on, give me a valid defense for western populations killing animals for taste alone.

      • threeduck
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Okay, I believe it is morally reprehensible to kill a sentient being - one that feels fear and does not want to die, solely for pleasure. Eating meat is immoral and in a just world, would be punishable.

          • threeduck
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Sentience means “the capacity to have feelings”, and it is widely understood by the scientific community that the vast majority of the animal kingdom has sentience.

            Do you believe cows can experience pain? Because we’re right up close against rejecting scientific consensus just to justify immoral actions. And that typically is frowned upon historically.

            Subjecting something that feels pain to experience pain for your pleasure is immoral.

            • linkhidalgogato@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              honestly i got sentience and sapience confused English isnt my first language, anyways point is it really doesnt matter that they feel pain that in no way affects this, and u know that it doesnt because if farm animals were first sedated before being killed it would not make u ok with it so stop being disingenuous.

              • threeduck
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                You’re right. If farm animals were sedated before being killed, it would certainly be preferable, but wouldn’t make it right.

                We have no right to cause pain, fear or death to sentient beings, purely for ~15 minutes or pleasure. Doing so is immoral. There is no valid argument against this. Trust me, I did NOT want to be a vegan. I argued against it for four years trying not to become one. But there was and is no argument against it. Eating meat is immoral, bad for the planet, bad for the animals, bad for modern medicine, and in a typical western diet, bad for your health.

                I repeat, there is no argument against veganism, and being vegan is objectively he correct moral choice.

                • linkhidalgogato@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  u keep saying there is no argument against veganism but reality is that there doesnt need to be one because there is also no argument FOR veganism, there is nothing immoral about eating meat, and u have not at any point presented an argument that would even suggest it is wrong, u just keep saying it is.

                  • threeduck
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    1 month ago

                    Okay, if you and I were sitting on a park bench together, and we saw a dog walk past, and I went off to go stomp the dog to death - would you think that was morally wrong of me? Would you try stop me?