• XIIIesq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Imagine criticising someone for using a word despite it having been in the vernacular for years.

        • XIIIesq@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Vernacular doesn’t need to belong to a person or even a group of people.

          If your problem is with the people who say it and not the word itself, that’s a different issue and one that I’m not really interested in debating.

          • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Vernacular doesn’t need to belong to a person or even a group of people.

            Then why do they call it “African American Vernacular English”?

            If your problem is with the people who say it and not the word itself, that’s a different issue and one that I’m not really interested in debating.

            Who says I can’t have two problems?

            • XIIIesq@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              Is English your second language? I didn’t say it can’t be associated to a person or group, I said it doesn’t need to.

              I also didn’t say that you can’t have more than one problem, I just addressed the one you seemed to be concerned with and defined it as one that I’m not interested in debating.