Reminds me of the ‘murder is okay’ meme.
Edit: this one.
Reminds me of the ‘murder is okay’ meme.
Edit: this one.
What you do is you go into the tumblr mines to screenshot someone else’s considered takes, and then be the first to post it somewhere else.
A pot o’ pho? Isn’t that a French thing?
I would go broader and say that the privilege of wealth is freedom from consequences.
What is a zero zone?
This is a win for everyone in Europe, and possibly beyond. [Emphasis mine.] Companies may no longer secretly track your behavior based on “consent” given under pressure. Hopefully, this will not only put an end to these dubious practices, but also to those pesky cookie banners.
But we’re not there yet. Regulators have ruled the system illegal, and the court’s ruling has now confirmed it. Still, the companies making billions from this model won’t stop on their own. That’s why European regulators must now truly step up: enforce the law and make sure these companies actually comply.
Regulators try not to get compromised by lobbyists when billions of dollars are at stake.
I sincerely wish you good luck.
I just figured that’s what being a sigma male/chad is.
(Is there a non-gendered word for it?)
You can sell me on Piefed without trying to cancel Lemmy out of nowhere.
How does it compare to mbin as a Lemmy alternative?
Listed here verbatim are three rock-solid recommendations from ICANN’s Security and Stability Advisory Committee.
Recommendation 1: SSAC recommends that any entity implementing or mandating DNS blocking understand the implications of the technology.
Recommendation 2: SSAC recommends that DNS blocking implemented by any entity — by a government or any organization that has policy, legal, or operational control over a network or service—follow these guidelines:
A. The entity should determine whether DNS blocking will fulfill its objectives.
B. The entity should have a clear policy about what and how it will block, with well-defined review and decision-making processes that minimize risk.
C. The entity should implement the policy using a technique that minimizes overblocking or collateral damage that could affect its users.
D. The entity should not affect networks or users outside its administrative control.
Recommendation 3: SSAC recommends that operators of recursive servers use DNS Extended Error codes (see section 6.6 Extended DNS Error) to indicate to end users and troubleshooters that DNS blocking is taking place.
Listed here verbatim are three rock-solid recommendations from ICANN’s Security and Stability Advisory Committee.
Recommendation 1: SSAC recommends that any entity implementing or mandating DNS blocking understand the implications of the technology.
Recommendation 2: SSAC recommends that DNS blocking implemented by any entity — by a government or any organization that has policy, legal, or operational control over a network or service—follow these guidelines:
A. The entity should determine whether DNS blocking will fulfill its objectives.
B. The entity should have a clear policy about what and how it will block, with well-defined review and decision-making processes that minimize risk.
C. The entity should implement the policy using a technique that minimizes overblocking or collateral damage that could affect its users.
D. The entity should not affect networks or users outside its administrative control.
Recommendation 3: SSAC recommends that operators of recursive servers use DNS Extended Error codes (see section 6.6 Extended DNS Error) to indicate to end users and troubleshooters that DNS blocking is taking place.
I use Caesium for image compression.
Not shilling, since both seem to be free and open-source image compressors.
How’s MAZANOKE different?
Time to plug into a WIRED subscription.
Time to not read this article.
Distaff counterpart to
Walking into a boudoir and stabbing the first ice lady you see is not justful behavior.
Just based on that thumbnail, I’m going to let it stay an unsolved mystery.
Probably depends on what kind of books you’re writing. A lot of people who write web serials start at Royal Road for example.
It sounds like a protection racket.
“Sure would be a shame if your package arrived in… less than ideal condition.”
I barely know anything about you or the service, but your posts in that thread actively drive me away from it.