minus-squareflaviat@awful.systemstoTechTakes@awful.systems•Credulous coverage of AI slop on WikipedialinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·13 hours ago So perhaps one alternative way to estimate their quality is to check the number of citations, many have more than 100 citations, which is a sign of quality Andrew Wakefield’s 1998 paper has 457 citations on PubMed linkfedilink
Andrew Wakefield’s 1998 paper has 457 citations on PubMed