data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eef43/eef43b933a355e7ffae48f6d6e04aaae7acfc8ae" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d7fc2/d7fc21676154deafcf3636aeb6fc10394582e8f7" alt=""
2·
2 years agoA switch statement will let control fall through. A switch expression will no, and will throw an exception (and there will also be a compiler warning that it’s not exhaustive before you even run the code)
A switch statement will let control fall through. A switch expression will no, and will throw an exception (and there will also be a compiler warning that it’s not exhaustive before you even run the code)
No need to rush out and replace Moq, you’re fine if you’re on a lower version. We are using 4.16 or something at work, and I don’t see any need to take any action there. Didn’t have a reason to upgrade anyway.
If the SponsorLink package comes back, and kzu is determined to push forward with it (which is absolutely his right to do) then long term I guess we’ll move to something else. My preference would be to stop using mocks altogether.