![](https://media.kbin.social/media/41/e6/41e69a4fa92a0af473ef819de96dc582379a50e274792cf2731c7d3c7affae21.png)
![](https://aussie.zone/api/v3/image_proxy?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsopuli.xyz%2Fpictrs%2Fimage%2F3d87a809-b49f-47a2-b46e-2d85d7d2f7a4.png)
The reverse is probably going to be true, unfortunately. The F16s weaponry is still based on 70s/80s engagement envelopes, more modern Russian a/c use missiles/radar that have much further range. The F16s will be most effective where UKR has additional anti-air assets to keep the more modern a/c away.
A very good breakdown of this by someone who’s studied military aircraft for a living…
https://xxtomcooperxx.substack.com/p/its-the-range-stupid-part-1
https://xxtomcooperxx.substack.com/p/its-the-range-stupid-part-2
https://xxtomcooperxx.substack.com/p/q-and-a-regarding-f-16s-for-ukraine
https://xxtomcooperxx.substack.com/p/q-and-a-regarding-f-16s-for-ukraine-51d
https://xxtomcooperxx.substack.com/p/q-and-a-regarding-f-16-for-ukraine
You had said “Allegedly they can shoot down Russian planes, because their targeting systems have longer range.”
My post was to share information to indicate that is not so - F16 does not have longer range.
The rest, you and Tom are in agreement.