What a wonderful moment to witness! A message finds the receiver it was intended for. Turns out it‘s not only a receiver but a repeater, too.
What a wonderful moment to witness! A message finds the receiver it was intended for. Turns out it‘s not only a receiver but a repeater, too.
it‘s a conspiracy theory and I am not sure whether you are pushing it. yesterday there was a big discussion about it on another thread and the proof presented by some was garbage.
I don‘t think so. He says burning down oil refineries would be great and says himself that the other form of protest is bad. I didn‘t position myself about that. He did, and I think he‘s a hypocrite for doing so.
Explain
and somebody else should be taking that kind of risk for us, for you?
There’s a lot of stuff I won’t admit to since this is a public account and a public identity.
haha
fair point. I think it is heart breaking that they seem to be losing this battle. No matter what kind of protest they choose, I keep hearing: Well, that‘s not the kind of protest I would support. So yeah, maybe they are at a dead end. But maybe not because they chose the wrong kind of protest, but because the public don‘t want change. Look at the European elections. It seems the other side‘s propaganda works a lot better, yeah.
Ich würde genau auf solche Dinge wie „du musst froh sein, dass…“ achten, und hierzu Memos verfassen. Denn das würde ich als Drohung verstehen und so würde ich das dann auch dem Betriebsrat präsentieren. Ein bisschen kannst du das vielleicht auch provozieren, wenn du vorsichtig fragst, warum er das dir erzählt.
So let‘s talk about the first article. It‘s written by art critic Alexander Adams who likes to talk about things like „why the Left hates good art“
https://soundcloud.com/user-923838732/alexander-adams-why-the-left-hates-good-art
Just the style of writing in this article gives away a lot:
The self-professed aims of these organisations and their millionaire backers are to bypass politics and implement radical measures upon the world’s population without democratic consultation.
the referenced piece here is written by a Breitbart editor by the way.
Anyway, so Just Stop Oil are going to bypass the world‘s democratic order? Yeah? By demanding them to follow through with their climate pledges? Oh man.
Also, it is no news, that the Getty heir is contributing to various funds, so what. I am a landlord and support Extinction Rebellion, does that make their actions inauthentic?
The reality is that the UK is using pretty straight forward laws to prevent this kind of protest, they don‘t need some kind of internationalist cabal to do that for them.
I think very little can be done to cause public outrage, which is what they want to do. This did it. Also I see no lasting damage being done to Stone Henge. And that‘s true for all their actions, as far as I know.
to our conversation, yes. I ask a question, not necessarily to you, you know, and you derail the conversation with: how should I know, I didn‘t make the deal with Lithuania? yeah it‘s relevant to my appreciation of you, I guess.
it doesn‘t seem logical to you that some people are freaking out because everybody is talking about climate change while it is clearly happening and it is becoming obvious that too little is being done too late?
you got some proof for that?
yeah? why?
it‘s still the old list of MEPs, right?
you find it weird that I asked that question?
Germany and other countries have soldiers stationed in Lithuania on a NATO initiative. Where‘s the difference?
Regarding the Georgian law about providing water to people in polling queues:
In August 2023, a federal judge ruled narrowly to eliminate the bill’s restrictions on distributing food and water in the 25-foot “supplemental zone” around voters. The ruling maintained the bill’s limitations within the 150-foot “buffer zone” around polling stations.
Gotta have special training to properly manage this kind of stuff.
NATO equities? What?