![](https://aussie.zone/api/v3/image_proxy?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffiles.techhub.social%2Faccounts%2Favatars%2F109%2F382%2F134%2F144%2F664%2F955%2Foriginal%2F85be40b0d0a22750.jpg)
![](https://aussie.zone/api/v3/image_proxy?url=https%3A%2F%2Flemmy.world%2Fpictrs%2Fimage%2Fd4155aa6-7ec0-4527-b43e-0db480bcf1c0.png)
0·
1 hour ago@ooli Please take a look at Mozilla’s Privacy Preserving Attribution experiment in #Firefox 128.0
https://andrewmoore.ca/blog/post/mozilla-ppa/
Algorithm Junkie, Data Structures lover, Open Source enthusiast, Tool maker
@ooli Please take a look at Mozilla’s Privacy Preserving Attribution experiment in #Firefox 128.0
https://andrewmoore.ca/blog/post/mozilla-ppa/
@mfat It’s the old problem about bugs. To know that a piece of software has no bugs you should be able to count them and if you could do it then should be able to locate them and make a fix. But you can’t then there’s no way to know there’s no more undetected backdoor
Of course being open source helps a lot but there’s no solver bullet
@KarnaSubarna also found some interesting style snippets for Firefox 😀
https://github.com/mbnuqw/sidebery/wiki/Firefox-Styles-Snippets-(via-userChrome.css)
@ooli and also Firefox CEO response
https://libreddit.kavin.rocks/r/firefox/comments/1e43w7v/a_word_about_private_attribution_in_firefox/