Steve Gibson’s InControl probably a no research needed option https://www.grctech.com/incontrol/details.htm
I’ve been listening to the security now podcast for about 8 years, so my trust of him and yours might vary. The website looks like web 1.0 because it is.
I like people doing challenge runs and speed runs, and occasionally letsgameitout who spends 1000 hours committing to the bit that I might have considered as a passing funny joke. I’d rather watch that then some evening ad riddled free to air.
I’m well over 30, not far from 40. Hobbies can be entertaining like watching someone else race a car. I ain’t gonna be able to do that. But I appreciate those who can.
I watch games about the game in gaming, but I also watch games about my game when I’m not gaming. Therefore by definition my gaming will be less than my watching gaming.
I know what I’m watching at dinner.
Amazing
This is more autism than adhd and it’s a huge value of autistic people to reflect a “normal” attitude as absurdity.
Your comment seems like a rational response to me.
After you boil them, is mashing them preferable? Or does that ruin the whole thing?
Ps if you want to be scared, look up showdan. Maybe look at showdan YouTube examples.
I trust Steve Gibson and I have listened to his podcast for years. Without trust, his tool does no more than what any other internet citizen can do, so even if you don’t trust it, it’s a trial by gentle fire.
Personally I recommend listening to security now podcast. But then again I’ve worked in IT for 15 years so it’s kind of my thing.
What a great post.
Good post, nothing else I have to add though.
Hey I don’t know your technical capability, but Steve Gibson pointed out the lowest knowledge way to get an isolated network just by buying two more cheap NAT routers. Your current router stays routing internet, but in LAN1 you plug in one of the new routers, let’s call it your home network, and LAN2 of your internet router plug in the other router and call it insecure. Plug in your WiFi access points into home and your devices. Plug in work laptop and other IoT to insecure. Home won’t be able to talk to insecure, and insecure can’t talk to home. This is all because of NAT. Just make sure the home network range is a different range to the insecure.
Otherwise it’s just a vlan on router and switches and access points with no firewall rules that allow INSECURE to HOME.
You might already know all this in which case never mind!
Well that was terrible.
By your definition I should be called a footballer because I play football once a week casually. Ignore the 50 plus hour weeks of my actual job. I got $50 from football as season champions (it’s a gift card, for the bar, at the place I play). I better go update my linkedin!
You’re funny, good one.
I thought this was an onion article.
This sounds unbelievable, like the turning of a ship to avoid an iceberg. It’s an unbelievably light sentencing, showcasing the country’s lack of interest in protecting women’s rights while declaring the intent to do so in the ruling.
If my partner was attacked, lost her hearing and had to attend court multiple times to defend her rights to safety, and the perpetrator got 3 years? I’d be furious.
I know she’d be devastated. The times she felt unsafe already leave such a big impact, let alone a realised attack.
Anyway. I do hope it’s just a positive sign, that all it will take is a bit more time. I want to believe it’s positive. But it’s wild to compare what I’d like to believe as obvious human rights; to not be attacked to the point of disability from an unprovoked human, then believe in the justice system in arrears to punish and (theoretically) prevent.
Anyway, long rant. Processing it because I probably believed Korea was better than that. Not all the humans, just at least the culture and law.
I’m not sure if this is satire, but America isn’t everyone. :)