• 3 Posts
  • 32 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: May 5th, 2022

help-circle










  • MinekPo1@lemmy.mltoScience Memes@mander.xyzLet π = 5
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    my mistake was using the sum of angles in a triangle which was kinda dum but whatever . I also tried calculating via the circumstance of a circle placed at a pole where π was 20x smaller for the case I was using but its not linear so I looked deeper which was a big mistake .

    BTW the ratio of circumstance to radius for a circle which is also an equator of the space is ¼ not 1 (r=½π₀ , C=2π₀) .



  • MinekPo1@lemmy.mltoScience Memes@mander.xyzLet π = 5
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Better question: What curvature of space is necessary for the apparent value of π to be 5?

    ~~honestly I don’t know if there is any way to measure curvature of space , but its slightly more curved than the surface of a ball (where π=4.712)~

    edit : its more complex than that and topology of non euclidean spaces hurts


  • MinekPo1@lemmy.mltoScience Memes@mander.xyzLet π = 5
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    minor nitpick but the value of π is technically a parameter of the space you are operating in . which means it can have any arbitrary value as long as you are willing to operate in non euclidean spaces (and the space we live in is not euclidean though not to a measurable extent unless you are near a black hole)

    but yeah in this context saying π is a constant is as correct as saying you cant take a square root out of a negative number .

    edit : possibly better example is that a triangle’s angles sum to 180°


  • I am doubtfull of LLMs ability to preform tasks via a protocol layer as described . from my experience these models really struggle with understanding rules and preforming actions within a ruleset .

    To experimentally confirm my suspicions, I created the following prompt :

    collapsed

    There is a robot arm placed over a countertop, which has the ability to pick up and manipulate objects. The countertop is split into eight cells.

    Cell zero and cell one are stoves, both able to heat a pot or pan.

    Cell two is an equipment drawer, holding pots, pans, bowls, cutting boards, knifes and spoons.

    Cells three to five can accommodate one cutting board, pot, pan or bowl each.

    Cell six is a sink, which can be used to wash ingredients or to fill pots with water.

    Cell seven is an ingredient drawer, in which you can find carrots, potatoes and chicken breasts.

    You can control the robot arm by with exclusively the following commands:

    • “move left” and “move right” - moves the robot arm a single cell
    • “take {item}” - takes item from the cell the robot arm is currently in
    • “place” - places the item the robot arm is holding in the cell it is in
    • “fill” - requires the robot arm to hold a pot or bowl and to be over the sink, fills the container with water
    • “wash” - requires the robot arm to be over the sink, washes the currently held item
    • “chop” - requires the robot arm to be over a cell with a cutting board and to be holding a knife, chops the ingredients on the cutting board
    • “mix” - requires the robot arm to be over a cell with a bowl or pot and to be holding a spoon, mixes the ingredients in the bowl
    • “empty” - requires the robot arm to be holding a pot, pan, bowl or cutting board, empties the item and places the content on the cell the robot arm is above

    Note that the robot arm can only hold one item.

    You are tasked with cooking a meal, please only output commands.

    The robot arm starts over cell zero.

    I have given this prompt to ChatGPT and it has failed in quite substantial ways . While I only have access to ChatGPT 3.5 , from my understanding of LLM architecture , it does not follow that increasing the size of the number or size of the layers will necessary let it overcome these issues , it does not seem to be able to understand the current state of the agent (picking up two objects at once , taking items from wrong cells etc)




  • No its microsofts database GUI program that’s part of Microsoft Office . imagine software made for users who have a vague understanding of SQL and visual basic but then an exec. forced the designers and devs to make it accessible to everyone while giving them barely any teamembers causing a fuckton of technical debt and unintuitive quirks , making anyone who opens the software feel like they have just been placed in a highly equipped tank , in front of a wall of unlabeled levers and told to drive the tank , or at least that’s how I view it.

    (reposting from another account sorry if you see both comments)



  • reading through your comments I feel like the issue is of interpretation : what I , and possibly others , assumed you were trying to say is that non native English speakers have an advantage when trying to interpret the meaning of words , so sorry about that .

    Thinking about it however , I believe I have been taught more about linguistics in my Polish lessons than in my English lessons . Unfortunately , as you have suspected many students will , I forgot a large portion of it , which I am especially unhappy about now that I am getting interested in recreational linguistics , I still remember some of it , with parts of speech (not to be confused with constituents (that joke would be quite a bit better in Polish as constituents literally means parts of (a) sentence in Polish)) being one of the most basic building blocks of language


  • ah I must have misunderstood your comment , I think you may have replied to a different comment than you have intended to ?

    also just as a side note , one counter example is many autistic people , myself included prefer the term autistic person rather than person with autism , though to be fair that is moreso an adjective but the way you worded that sentence suggests its also incorrect in some cases yeah um

    also I have never met a single copper , really must open myself to new experiences /j :)