• Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    6 months ago

    It can do that now. Probably not with zero driver interventions especially when talking about a trip across the country but Tesla is the only vehicle manufacturer today that offers this capability. There’s a dude on YouTube doing ridesharing with Tesla using FSD and with the latest software version it completes 90% of the trips from the pickup to the destination without intervention from the driver.

    • Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      It can do that now.

      OK? Doubts.

      Probably not with zero driver interventions

      Oh so it can’t?!

      Musk also said more safely than a human being. I’ve seen videos with FSD creating numerous dangerous situations on a single trip, that required quick intervention to avoid collisions. Driving in narrow roads it would suddenly turn into opposite traffic (potentially lethal), not minding right of way in crosses (also potentially lethal), and even turning straight towards parked cars, when the lane it was in was unobstructed!!

      Another video I saw, it crossed at a very clear red light!! That’s a very potentially lethal situation.

      There is no way it can be reasonably argued that Tesla has working full self driving.

      it completes 90% of the trips

      You know 90% isn’t even close to being half finished. The next 9% are probably more difficult, and the last percent the most difficult. There’s a reason the hard parts are finished last.

      • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        I don’t see anyone claiming they have “working full self driving”. That’s a strawman argument. Their system is really good and years ahead of competition but there’s still a shit ton to improve. That’s why it’s classified as level 2 and not level 3. It’s a vehicle capable of driving itself under supervision but it’s not a self driving vehicle.

        I’ve seen videos with FSD creating numerous dangerous situations on a single trip

        In the past few months? Because the current software version is completely different than what it used to be. They’ve moved entirely from human code to neural nets and it made a giant improvement in its performance.

        • Buffalox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          I don’t see anyone claiming they have “working full self driving”

          The whole thread is about Musk claiming in 2019 that Tesla has FSD working NOW, that could drive the car from a parking lot on the other side of the country (USA) and pick you up in a parking lot where you are. AND that it could drive more safely than a human being.
          I am not interested in the slightest whether it’s 50% or 90% there now, the fact is the claim was made first in 2016, that Tesla would have it ready NEXT YEAR, and in 2019 he claimed it was ready NOW! And it’s STILL not ready!!

          So what is it about Musks claims being false you don’t understand?

          I don’t see anyone claiming they have “working full self driving”.

          That’s decidedly false, because you yourself wrote:

          It can do that now.

          • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            6 months ago

            The whole thread is about Musk claiming in 2019 that Tesla has FSD working NOW

            From the article:

            (1) representations that Tesla vehicles have the hardware needed for full self-driving capability and, (2) representations that a Tesla car would be able to drive itself cross-country in the coming year.

            So not only are you clearly emotionally invested here but you’re also being dishonest about the claims that have been made. I don’t think there’s any reason to go further with this.

            • Buffalox@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              Oh boy you are tiresome, I wrote the thread, not the post.
              But still the context of “the coming year” Musk claimed Tesla had that NOW in 2019, and it would be made available to consumers in the coming year being 2020. It’s from the exact same presentation.

              Nothing you quote contradicts anything I wrote. It’s just different parts of the same thing, which of course requires background knowledge you evidently don’t have.

        • racemaniac@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          “Their system is really good and years ahead of competition but there’s still a shit ton to improve”

          Is it years ahead of the competition? I thought the consensus was that Tesla is far behind, hence why Mercedes is the first brand to actually have some basic level 3 automomus driving actually to customers, and companies other than tesla are actually doing tests with robo taxis. Tesla is good at claiming it can do the above, other companies are the ones actually doing it.

          And indeed, there’s a shit ton to improve, which directly contradicts statements Elon Musk made, and keeps making. As others already pointed out, calling it Full Self Driving while letting it do that is basically suicide is just the beginning. Elon Musk regularly repeating that it’s there, it works etc… only to leave customers waiting for nearly 8 years now with a system that is not what Elon described, etc…

          Self driving is really hard, Tesla made some good progress on it, but Elon continuously lying about it should indeed get legal consequences. I’m hope this lawsuit teaches him to actually talk about things he actually knows are true, and not just what he wishes was true.

          • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            I thought the consensus was that Tesla is far behind, hence why Mercedes is the first brand to actually have some basic level 3 automomus driving actually to customers

            Yeah that seems to be the consensus but I have no idea what it’s based on. When the Mercedes system is put against FSD it looks like this. The level 3 driving is available only on a handful of highways between LA, SF and LV and even then only in ideal weather and traffic conditions.

            If the competition really is ahead then where are all the videos of their vehicles doing what FSD does? There are countless accounts on YouTube demonstrating the capabilities of FSD driving both on highways and in cities but nothing about these other brands.

            • Buffalox@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              I have no idea what it’s based on.

              It’s obviously based on other makers being ahead.

              Mercedes, Waymo, GM, MobilEye, Nvidia are all ahead, making Tesla #6 at best.

              When the Mercedes system is put against FSD it looks like this.

              Are you misleading on purpose? Or are you really that dense?

              https://www.mbusa.com/en/owners/manuals/drive-pilot

              Mercedes Calls their version of fully autonomous driving: Drive Pilot but you show a comparison to a way more basic Driving Assistant, which is nowhere close!

              This comparison shows that Tesla FSD in reality is merely a drive assist.

              • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                Are you misleading on purpose?

                The level 3 driving is available only on a handful of highways between LA, SF and LV and even then only in ideal weather and traffic conditions.

                Stated clearly in the very next sentence.

                This comparison shows that Tesla FSD in reality is merely a drive assist.

                Always has been. That video compares drive assist to another. Apples to apples comparison. What exactly is the issue here?

            • PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocksB
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

              this

              Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

              I’m open-source; check me out at GitHub.

            • racemaniac@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              Why don’t you ask the experts that rather than a random lemming like me? And why don’t you ask Elon why he keeps claiming it’s capable of more than it actually is?

              I honestly don’t care enough about it to do research, but you seem to. And i’d just love for guys like Elon to stop lying about what they have.

        • efstajas@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          I don’t see anyone claiming they have “working full self driving”

          … They’re literally calling it “Full self driving”.

          • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            …and I don’t see anyone claiming it to be “working” as in it being safe enough to not need supervision.