• fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    To be clear, I don’t refuse to provide my Day and Month of Birth, simply because I don’t want to be some kind of privacy pariah.

    That said, while it may have been a reasonable point of ID in the 90s, I don’t believe that remains the case in 2024.

    The basic concept of Australian Privacy Legislation is that organisations ought to collect only that information which they require, and they should disclose the reason why they are collecting that data.

    If the only reason to collect ones Day and Month of birth is so I can repeat it back and confirm it later then that seems very pointless to me. There are other details which they do require which can be used to confirm my identity.

    • Landsharkgun@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 months ago

      Which other identifiers would you feel comfortable confirming? Is there a reason you think DoB is dangerous to share?

      • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        DoB is considered sensitive personal information in the Australian Privacy Act.

        Other identifiers might be street number or last three digits of phone number.

    • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 months ago

      That said, while it may have been a reasonable point of ID in the 90s, I don’t believe that remains the case in 2024.

      It’s useful for quickly disambiguating between multiple people with the same name though - the odds that two people with the same name and date of birth are using the same provider on the same day are low enough to consider it useful.

      • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        I’m certain that fewer than 0.1% of patients at a small medical clinic would share the same first and last names. In those cases, you could differentiate by address and age if necessary.

        • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          I think you underestimate how common the most common first and last names are. In an even small city you are likely to see repeats of the most common names.

            • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              Yes, uniquely identifying the patient is important, especially for pharmacies where people with the same name might receive different doses of the same drug or receive similar sounding drugs that the patient might not catch.

              What would you suggest? It needs to be a piece of information that is probably unique when paired with name at least as far as the local area, that absolutely everyone has, that the pharmacy and doctor both have and is unlikely to change (to avoid issues where records in one place are updated before the other).

    • prayer@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      When I donate blood, they ask me for that info like 3 or 4 times throughout the process. While it probably doesn’t apply to a regular doctors visit, I think it’s also used to gauge if you are alert and your memory is good.