• WhyDoYouPersist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          I read that last year, actually. Potential spoilers:

          Just difference of opinion but I wasn’t a fan. I obviously think the subject matter is interesting and I liked the sociopolitical basis of the story. But I felt it was bogged way down by an author who was trying to make several parts into some weirdly verbose report to give it a sense of realism (I seem to recall an entire chapter being a written-out list of fictional committee names that were being created to fight climate change). At the same time, when he was writing about the terrorist attacks like swarms of drones attacking infrastructure, it felt really vague and Hollywood, dare I say, even boomer-esque. Just a bit lofty for the sake of action.

          You’re in good company though, I remember reddit fuckin loved that book so it’s probably just not for me. I’m also sensitive to hype and it didn’t live up to it.

          • YtA4QCam2A9j7EfTgHrH@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            Yeah, not every book is for everyone. Doesn’t really change whether or not I liked the book.

            The book has flaws for sure, but it seemed like it was almost as alarmist as it should be. It seemed utopian to me in the end. He completely missed out on how fascists are going to react to all this for instance.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    5 months ago

    Exclusively working from home since 2018 so I cut out 10 un-necessary driving trips a week. x2 since my wife is WFH now too.

    Installed solar panels to run the house during the day, so our working hours are fully solar powered.

    I guess that’s all we can do for now.

    • Habahnow@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      5 months ago

      If you’re looking for other things to do:

      • vote to address climate change (some people can only really vote to reduce the damage done slightly)
      • Reduce meat consumption (doesn’t even have to be zero meat)
      • Reduce flying Regardless, thanks for driving less, and helping the cause!
        • phoenixz@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Been doing that all my life. For that you have water tight bags on your bike.

          Also, you’ll have much more smaller supermarkets dotted all over the place, instead of one Walmart for an entire city. You just go and quickly buy the stuff you will use that day.

          It really isn’t an issue

  • nifty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    5 months ago

    Voting is great, but lobbying, gerrymandering and PACs can subvert the democratic process. Historically, this is where protests have shown to be helpful.

  • phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    5 months ago

    The most powerful action? Make our politicians start investing heavily in bicycle infrastructure and public transportation infrastructure.

    This car culture is insane

  • blazera@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Personal vehicles are the largest single source of emissions in the US.

    • mynachmadarch@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      If only denser housing structures and public transportation and work from home didn’t all keep getting voted down and shouted down by NIMBYs so we had a better way. I get out and vote and write letters to elected officials. Not much more many of us can do.

      • Coreidan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Huh so you’re telling me most people want nothing to do with living in crammed apartment buildings?

        Wow shocked pikachu face.

        • mynachmadarch@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          Wow. Way to show you have no understanding of neither the proposed solutions nor NIMBYs. The idiots voting them down don’t care about what is actually being proposed, they care exclusively that it will lower housing costs. If there’s enough housing for everyone their house suddenly isn’t as precious a commodity and their retirement plan just withered away.

          There’s plenty of people who would happily move into new apartments.

          • Coreidan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            5 months ago

            Cool story bro. Have fun living in a crammed apartment building. Be sure to comment about how awesome it is and how everyone should do it.

        • Habahnow@sh.itjust.worksOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          … you realize the US has a huge housing problem where thousands of people are literally without a home? I bet a lot of people would choose to live in a “crammed” apartment building than be homeless. Right now, NIMBYs don’t even want the free market to dictate whether dense housing should be created. There’s zoning restrictions which don’t allow the option for the creation of denser housing. What’s happening now is home owners in those areas want to continue to disallow other people to build denser housing. Not even talking about 20 floor building, but sometimes even 2 story apartments or a location where more than 1 family can legally live. Its extremely regressive and helps their home prices increase, while making it harder for non home owners to gain a home.

    • Habahnow@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      wow, didn’t think that was the case, but based on 2021’s numbers, its true. Transportation from vehicles, including personal vehicles, accounts for 29% of emissions. This is the largest source, right above electricity generation (25%). Thought transportation would be top 3 but that something else would overtake it. source

  • Nyfure@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    First thing to come to mind is: Voting. Wherever you are.

    EDIT: Wow, guess i am not alone with that,