Sort comments by new for them to make sense.

  • ZagorathOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    In speaking to the amendment, Cr Wines says that because of Cr Johnston’s concerns, his amendment is going to call for another speed limit review after just 2 years instead of their normal minimum of 5 years, and that this is him taking the concerns very seriously.

    Personally, I actually agree with him on this. There are clearly problems with how the speed limit review process works, but I believe council is required by law to follow it, and their willingness to at least try it again now is not a bad thing.

    edit: see below. This is not true, and it’s really weak from the LNP.

    • ZagorathOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Unfortunately the potentially beneficial nature of their amendment is vastly overshadowed by some appalling bullying from Crs Wines, Murphy, and even the Chair of Council Cr Toomey, towards Cr Johnston.

    • ZagorathOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Cr Johnston says that actually no, engineers do not have to be consulted to sign off on speed limit reductions, as seen in Boundary Rd, Camp Hill.

      While the speed limit review committee will need to consider the new rules and make an official decision, today we have reduced Boundary Rd to 60 km/h.

      She quotes from Cr Adams, speaking on a speed limit reduction made for the safety of koalas.

      Every year the LNP vote down motions I move to make people safer.

      Says a clearly emotional Cr Johnston.

      • ZagorathOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        There is one rule for the LNP in this place and one rule for everybody else.

        Cr Wines was clearly not saying the truth when he said “I value human life the highest”. Suggests Cr Johnston.