• PugJesus@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    Don’t worry, he’s ‘only’ betting that useful idiots in the West will restrain Western governments from reacting in any way, shape, or form.

    • Endorkend@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      That’s why, although I’m in no way a fan of Macron, I love that he has put the idea out of at the very least starting to put boots on the ground.

      At the end of that war, we can not permit it to be in the form of Ukraine losing even an inch of landmass. Because then in 5-10 years, Putin will just do the same thing again, maybe not in Ukraine, but elsewhere.

      The only way to stop Putins madness is by making every thing he does cost him dearly.

      • cybersin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        6 months ago

        France putting “boots on the ground” would mean a direct conflict between nuclear powers and would likely drag in the entirety of NATO.

        Unless you want to live Fallout, such an escalation would be absolutely insane.

        • Endorkend@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          The threat needs to be there and real, otherwise Putin and Russia will never stop.

          THAT is the insanity.

          We’ve tried the economic approach, we’ve tried talking, we’ve tried not doing more than sending weapons to Ukraine.

          It clearly doesn’t work and Putin will just keep repeating what he has been doing until there’s actual repercussions to what he’s doing.

        • maynarkh@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 months ago

          Not necessarily. NATO only gets involved if one of the members are fighting a defensive war, which this would not be, and the member in question specifically requests help.

          Most of NATO didn’t go to Iraq for example.

          • cybersin@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            6 months ago

            Yes, but that is irrelevant. France involving themselves opens them up to retaliation from Russia. If Russia retaliated against France, and even if not strictly required to by Article 5, it is likely other NATO countries would join the conflict.

            • maynarkh@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              Yeah, but Russia won’t retaliate, because it knows that. Russia committing genocide opened them up to retaliatory actions like this. I’m under no illusion that France is only there to protect its geopolitical ambitions against those of Russia, but Russia gave them a justification, escalated the conflict in a way.

              Let’s hope Russia won’t escalate further.