Pedant warning: your last phrase should contain “than”, not “then”.
Indeed. I literally never use the word “than”. Fuck grammar, “than” looks weird.
I never say “than”, I say “then”, therefore it just seems right to spell it how I always say it.
Edit: I wonder what the most downvoted comment is on Lemmy World, am I making history?
Edit: I’m concerned for everyone who upvoted this
I mean, I suppose I respect the commitment to just being unequivocally wrong.
And ignorant…
I’m not really ignorant if I know I am using bad grammar. I know it’s wrong I just do it anyways. That makes me stupid, not ignorant
Obstinate sure but not ignorant.
If it was an actual formal writing I would use proper grammar but other then (oh man what do I do here) that I never really use than.
Lol it’s not grammar, you’ve used an entirely different word that just sounds kinda similar. You’re essentially saying the actual words used don’t matter in these two sentences because they sound similar:
I like to wear t-shirts
Eye lick two where tea-shits
Hilarious when people want to resort to “I WASN’T WRITING FORMALLY” in these situations. Just take the L and acknowledge it was a flub. Much less cringe that way.
Oh I absolutely did take the L
In dead case, I fish you the bessed.
Consider this: when you speak the listeners know what you mean based on the rest of the sentence. When you write you give the reader the intended word through spelling. People who read will see your words and assume you really meant “then” instead of “than”, and the sentence will make little sense.
The words “I” and “eye” sound similar, but if you write “eye” I will read a sentence first thinking you are trying to say something about an eye, then when it breaks down, go back and find the issue. End that my friend is less then eye-deal for comprehension.It’s not grammar it’s an entitlement different word. It would be like refusing to call a dog a dog because you think it sounds better to call it a cat.
Edit - you know what, I’m leaving that auto correct in. Entitlement looks better here to me than entirely.
I laterally never use the word “entirely”. Fuck grandma, “entirely” looks weird.
I never say “entirely”, I say “entitlement”, therefore it just seems right to spell it how I always say it.
I think you meant “literally”. Laterally is a complacently different word
I think you meant “completely”. Complacently is a completely diffident word.
I thank you meant “completely”, which is totally different to “complacently”
I think you moan “think”, which is totally different to “thank”
I think you meant “mean”, hitch is completely different to “moan”.
*littoral
Almost perfect.
Fuck grandma, “entirely” looks wired. Would be chiefs kiss.
Unforchunetly, Ingglish speling duzn’t laiyn up with saowndz wun-tuh-wun.
Spelling things how you say them can lead to people misunderstanding or causing unintended(?) pain.
Understood everything you wrote without issue.
English is a Honda civic. Its not pretty but it works even after years of abuse and neglect
We write our language (swiss-german) like this 😂 everything is allowed and there are strangely very little misunderstandings. Only bad thing about is, that swiping keyboard rarely work with it.
I do with English would switch to phonetic spelling, including the eventi of the speaker, but we’re never going to switch. At least the standardized spelling does have a very minor advantage in terms of disambiguation with homophones. But then we had to go and mess up read/read and lead/lead.
Read/ret lead/let -> easy 😜 but how to write “do” I mean it is not a normal spoken “o” and not exactly a “u” like it is a “u” but without (yo)u Write phonetic is more easy in German, I think, or maybe only because it is my birth language 🤔
I think you might speak English with a thick German accent based on your perceptions of how you’d spell our words
Fair 😆and expectable, since I normally write phonetic in the german way
And us german-germans think you are very weird and you might as well call your spoken language something other than german, cause no one can understand it anyways. Also why are you so afraid of this: ß?
It’s too sharp they don’t wanna get cut
You literally used the word “than” in your comment just now.
“Language is fluid and constantly changing”Our education system is in the toilet and I didn’t pay attention 😂
Upvoted because you have the sort of can do won’t do attitude that made American English great. Emerald for dictionarian!
The literal way to read what you wrote is to never ask Flatpak, in order:
- how it can download more
- the total file size
The only reason no one thinks this is what you mean is because of how many people also mess this up.
I hope this does not affect your usage of effect in the correct context.
As a former copy editor I find the effect of using affect incorrectly eye roll inducing.
But yeah, affect is a verb, effect is a noun.
The easy rule of thumb for then/than is that if you are comparing things or qualities or quantities of things, you use than, otherwise, then is used.
I came across effect/affect swapping in university level textbook the other day, couldn’t believe it.
But yeah, affect is a verb, effect is a noun.
Unless you are effecting a change :)
If you mean that you are having an effect on said change… oh god maybe that’s actually correct?
If you are affecting (a) change, that would mean you are basically causing change.
But if you are effecting change, said change would have to have been previously established or referenced.
I think???
English is a goddamned shit-show sometimes.
Anyway, we should bring back the interrobang, and the thorne, and also I actually love the Oxford comma even though the AP style guide hates it.
It’s the other way around! Effecting a change means causing it, whereas affecting a change would be having some effect on an existing change.
I thought there would be a hyphen between “eye” and “roll”, no?
lol, you are correct!
This is me with everyday and every day. It’s an everyday occurrence that I see everyday used incorrectly!
I upvoted it because its nice for someone, anyone to be concerned about me.
Hoink me with your yimyam flutings.
Sir I have downvoted simply to help you reach a record know that in my heart it is an upvote.
They reject u even though you spoken truest worders good are.
Nobody who spoke English that read your sentence misunderstood what you said based and than vs then and that English doesn’t have to be pretty to get the job done
I had to read your comment at least twice before I could parse it.
So basically what you’re both saying is that you are so incredibly selfish, you don’t care if someone needs to read your comments multiple times in order to not misunderstand you, as long as it’s easier for you and you don’t have to bother learning to be understood
Thanks man
Are you using a white theme terminal? I hope it’s just an edited screenshot.White theme terminal
deleted by creator
Check out the neat themes of UNIX legends:
https://anders.unix.se/2015/12/10/screenshots-from-developers--2002-vs.-2015/Oh boy, never meet your heroes.
Bantha Fodder
What the fuck is wrong with you lol
Based and anti-dark-theme-cult-pilled
Consider Solarized Light, its is easier on the eyes
The name “Solarized” suggests otherwise.
Nord Light was also pretty good when I tried it. I waffle back and forth between light and dark themes now and then and there’s always a few good options that brighten the space without flashbanging you.
Yes.
deleted by creator
Light theme used to be the only theme. People now need dark themes because they’re eyes are too week from all the worke.
And before that, black text printed on white continuous form paper.
Paper doesn’t fry my eyeballs.
You could turn down the brightness lol
Now I’m wondering if historically people started writing on blackboards first or in paper. Etching into wood/stone doesn’t count since it lacks contrast.
If you look at the Lascaux cave paintings, there’s great potential for a soft earthy color theme imho. Black and red on off-white, similar colors as medieval vellum with black ink and vermillion red/orange.
No not that far back
please let your grammar be indication that this is satire
deleted by creator
We’ll update the 200 mb program.
not pictured: the other 500mb of libraries and dependencies that tag along.
I also enjoy needing to download 1GB to update a 14MB program
The race never stopped. You buy an Apple II. It works for a while. Then everyone is running Lotus 1-2-3 so you gotta get an expensive 386. Now Windows 3.1 and 95 is the standard, and you need Internet too so you buy a modem and a Pentium machine for a couple grand. It’s okay for a while. Then downloads take longer and longer, and your computer gets slower again, so you upgrade to 6mbps cable internet and an AMD athlon/Pentium 4, and Windows XP. It’s okay for a while. But then games and software no longer fit on a CD ROM. They’re using DVDs, and the space they take up on your HD is approaching tens of GB. Suddenly you need to upgrade to 25mbps internet and a terabyte drive to keep up with the space requirements and updates/service packs. You’re on a multi core CPU now because nobody fucking optimizes shit anymore and assumes you have the horsepower to deal with it. Then they get rid of physical media altogether. Now you’re stuck downloading a fucking several hundred gigabyte game or piece of software on a 100+mbps connection to do largely the same shit we did on that Apple II in 1980. Your system RAM alone can now hold all software ever made for that Apple II with plenty room to spare.
I get why a lot of retirees in the industry want to burn their computers and take up farming.
I want to do that, but not because of Flatpak. That’s incredibly far down the list of things I find offensive in my professional life. At the very least it does fulfill some sort of purpose and also doesn’t cost any money to use.
I am learning flatpak. Can someone explain why is like that???
Well, one part of it is that Flatpak pulls data over the network, and sometimes data sent over a network doesn’t arrive in the exact same shape as when it left the original system, which results in that same data being sent in multiple copies - until one manages to arrive correctly.
Could also be that the HTTP server lied about the content length.
It’s a protocol violation to do that, not least because it precludes connection reuse
??? Retransmitted packets don’t get counted towards downloaded file size
Shoddy implementation they can’t be arsed to fix. They do all kinds of shenanigans like show the size of all locales but only download one, or the other way around, it does not count dependencies and then realizes it has to download something extra etc. It’s all over the place and I’ve given up on it making any sense. I’ve just made sure it’s on a drive with plenty of space and hope for the best.
something something ostree and how complicated the stuff it does actually is
Makes me think about what I should prioritize… network transfer or local storage.
/c/datahoarders would like to know your location
My updates did the opposite:
Its a bug
