• howrar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Gotta ignore infinities too. The axioms they’re based on are highly controversial.

      • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        And irrational imaginary numbers. I mean the numbers make sense, but it’s not like we can intuitively understand sqrt(-1).

    • reinei@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Nah even statistics is perfectly logical and right, but not because truth is absolute (there may be such a thing, but we definitely don’t have access to it in that case. [At this time?]), but rather because math defined there to be a way in which all you derive from it is ‘absolutely’ true. It just might be ‘absolutely’ true in a system that isn’t ours, or isn’t useful for answering anything we want to ask…