• credo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    153
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    50,000 cycles

    Wow, a lifetime of 137 years at one cycle per day. This could make off-grid systems mainstream.

    • SOB_Van_Owen@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      53
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Long-time offgridder here. Would love to have a reasonable alternative to lead-acid or lithium. Opted for lead-acid again on the last battery swap around 5 years ago. Squeezed about 12 years out of the last set -though they were pretty degraded by that time. This bank is depreciating faster, probably because of increased use.

      • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Lead acid batteries seem to be less and less reliable lately. The warranties are shorter and shorter as well, which is the best supporting evidence I have beyond needing batteries more often for the 4-5 vehicles I maintain.

    • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Batteries degrade with age too. It would probably have to be cycled 10 times a day to get that many cycles.

      • Cort@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        8 months ago

        I could see that happening if these are used in gas hybrid cars, or ev taxis, or maybe grid scale energy buffering

        • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          8 months ago

          They may work for non plug in hybrids, which have quite small batteries that cycle a lot, but the energy density is far too low for full EV vehicles.

    • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      For real. It will take up a lot more space than lithium, but if it lasts way longer and should end up being cheaper, it would definitely be the winning choice. Solar array on the roof and a huge outdoor battery in a shed against the house and no more electric bill, ever.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      The shitty thing right now is grid connection is required by pretty much any building code, and the utilities are getting wise to solar. They’re moving a lot of the fees from power use to connection and line maintenance. My family was looking at solar, but since 2/3 of their power bill is just to be connected to the grid it wouldn’t save enough to make economic sense.