• timgrant@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Rebel shareholders such as Alta Fox have been touting the radical concept of investing in the business, creating good products, and selling them.

    You know, instead of screwing up relationships with long-term business partners, sending hired heavies to their fans’ houses, and driving their customers to their competition.

    So crazy it just might work.

    • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      2 months ago

      The meme refers to the landmark Ford case where the shareholders successfully sued him to prevent the company from issuing a bonus to share profits to employees. This nefarious precedent turned corporations into the monsters they are today.

      Obligatory Ford was a POS that did some things right.

      • Shard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 months ago

        Ford for all his flaws had plenty of revolutionary ideas that actually improved workers conditions. Even if he only did it to capture the workers and “lock them in”, it was much better than what any of the competitors were offering and it forced the competitors to improve their conditions to retain workers.

        The worst part of that ruling was that some of the minority shareholders were actually competitors and they used that money to start up their own competing factories.

        Just goes to show how focusing on the business long term is always in the shareholders interests and most of the time focusing on shareholders interests aren’t in the best interest of the shareholders themselves. Modern day short sellers being the most egregious example of this.

      • LoamImprovement@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I mean, let’s not pretend Ford was paying his employees well and setting workweek standards because it was the right thing to do either - he did it because he wanted to retain productive employees and also to make them customers, and that it happened to actually be beneficial for them and the working world at large is a byproduct. Not often mentioned with that $5 workday is the fact that he would send agents to employees’ homes to ensure they were being kept clean and that the employees themselves weren’t drinking.