I have been looking for manufacturing, assembly, production positions all over the Midwest. It’s absolutely shocking how many of them want you to work rotating shifts.

Look at the image I submitted. That company wants you to work 3rd shift one week, then 2nd shift the next, then 1st shift the next, and then repeat it over and over. How in the hell is that healthy?

And this requirement for rotating shifts is prevalent in so many job ads now. WTF is going on with the world?

Full job ad here:

https://www.indeed.com/viewjob?jk=2ac8cd23b6411f88

  • kava@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    2 months ago

    If this is evil then any company offering a job is evil. I offer you a job working from 9am-5pm. You have a certain schedule such thaf you cannot meet those terms. I am evil because you have no choice but to work for me or starve.

    See what I mean? And sure, capitalism is exploitative. But I don’t see how this specific arrangement is any more or less exploitative than any other.

    Factories need workers around the clock because it is expensive to start and stop operations. So you develop strategies in order to keep everyone happy.

    Sort of like how oil rigs or deep sea fishing does the x months work y months home thing. Work for 3 months, take off for 1. Etc.

    • Boozilla@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      This is exactly why. A shutdown/startup is not just inconvenient. In many factories, it can cost them a huge chunk of money. It’s more than just lost time and income. There are costly procedures in the mix. There are strict quotas and contracts to meet with customers. A factory that shuts down every night is not efficient or sustainable.

      I’m very pro-worker and anti-boss, but it’s naive to expect factories to not have a night shift.

      Long term it will be robots doing most of it, anyway.

      • TTH4P@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        To quote @jpreston2005 “the better option is not having a rotating shift, and compensating the employees that have to take third shift”