The EU’s Data Protection Board (EDPB) has told large online platforms they should not offer users a binary choice between paying for a service and consenting to their personal data being used to provide targeted advertising.

In October last year, the social media giant said it would be possible to pay Meta to stop Instagram or Facebook feeds of personalized ads and prevent it from using personal data for marketing for users in the EU, EEA, or Switzerland. Meta then announced a subscription model of €9.99/month on the web or €12.99/month on iOS and Android for users who did not want their personal data used for targeted advertising.

At the time, Felix Mikolasch, data protection lawyer at noyb, said: “EU law requires that consent is the genuine free will of the user. Contrary to this law, Meta charges a ‘privacy fee’ of up to €250 per year if anyone dares to exercise their fundamental right to data protection.”

  • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 months ago

    So I will offer constructive pushback instead of inane downvotes like everyone else.

    clowns

    This word does literally nothing except trivialize your argument and so make it less convincing.

    don’t give a shit

    Ditto. Makes you sound angry and irrational. Not much of an incentive to go on reading.

    psychotic

    psychopathy

    These are medical terms. Presumably you will claim to mean them literally and not figuratively. But really, nobody is going to assume in good faith that you’re a doctor or a psychologist. So, again, the result is to undermine your whole point and make it seem like empty bloviating.

    Hope that helps.