• Wrench@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    That’s why it’s a wealth cap. That’s net worth, not income.

    You exceed the 20m cap, you have to pay the excess to taxes. If it’s locked in company shares, you have to sell them and pay that in taxes.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      The tricky part is that has implications for business control. Other people speculate the market cap into 50m and then they take over control of your company, because you are forced to sell off your stake. So an arbitrary coalition of 3 rich dudes can just take over your company on a whim, if it is vaguely important enough. A coalition of rich people is not likely going to treat the customers or employees better.

      • Wrench@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        I think that’s a solvable problem. Theoretical value of a private company’s shares would need to be more flexible because the real worth won’t be known until selling your stake, or the company going public where there is a concrete value.