Which will explode in the near future in your opinion and why?

  • HexTrace@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    There’s a fair amount of waste involved in 3D printing (support structures for example), as well as expertise needed to figure out tolerances and quirks of an individual printer. There’s also an argument that we need improvements in 3D printing that would allow us to use metal (sintering) instead of plastic (extruding or UV exposure) both for sustainability and structural reasons.

    I’d agree that 3D printing has a much higher potential than it currently is used for, but let’s not pretend it’s a cure-all for consumerism.

    • knoland@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      This waste is also present in traditional injection molding in the form of sprues, runners, and gates (probably less, though it depends on the site specifics).

    • Kranerian@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, anyone who thinks that 3d printers are the answer to everything hasn’t spent weeks trying to calibrate the damn things.

    • dm_me_your_secrets@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Other people have already addressed the waste portion of your argument. The part that I’d like to address is the “expertise needed”. I completely agree with how difficult it can be to learn. I mean, just calibrating your printer can be a whole job. However, I don’t think it’s necessarily something that everyone would have to have a printer to get the benefits of the tech. I already see many people that sell “3D-Printing services” I have my own 3D-printer, but I have even paid people to print certain things for me. If people can find 3D-printable files (thangs, printables, thingiverse) then they can get someone to pay for much cheaper and faster than ordering a rare part overseas.