• refalo@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        with an x86 license

        doesn’t that still mean they are dependent on the West technically?

        • Broken@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          In it’s roots, yes. But the architecture isn’t banned, just the chips. As an analogy, China can make its own internal combustion engines and not buy Ford cars.

          • refalo@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            I meant, if they require a license to keep making x86 chips, what’s to stop Intel/the US from revoking it later on?

            • Miaou@jlai.lu
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              At this point the licencing is only about Intel getting money, not about China being allowed to produce the chips, me thinks