• shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 months ago

      That’s what you hear about. You don’t hear about the other 40,000 gun deaths (almost half suicides) anymore than you hear about the 40,000 vehicular deaths.

      Kis shoots up a school and kills 5? All over the media for a solid week. Asshole ripping down the interstate takes out a family of 5? Meh. Quick local news blurb.

      OP’s point is that rifles, legal or not, aren’t what’s doing all the killing. It’s the pistols. Nobody will talk about it because there’s no way in hell for a pistol ban to pass. But words like “assault” and “military” get traction.

      Remember Virginia Tech? Worst mass murder at the time? Kid did most of his killing with a .22 pistol.

    • Vendetta9076@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      They were. They were horrific tragedies. They are also the outlier of outliers. And any legislation targeting them is either a) going to have zero effect on crime, b) only going to harm law abiding citizens or C) both

      • tetris11@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        isn’t it specifically going to rein in the outlier of outliers that school shootings are? I think people would be really happy with that, even if the average crime rate doesn’t go down

        • Vendetta9076@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          I doubt it If they cant get an ar they’ll just go get a black market pistol for $100. And besides, the way to curb school shootings isn’t through firearm restrictions. It’s through actual proper mental health programs and funding. Something that the US government refuses to fund because it’ll actually fix the problem instead of just being a feel good gesture.

          • hedgehog@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            The only shootings where mental illness plays a major factor are suicides. When it comes to gun violence, only 4-5% of perpetrators have a severe mental illness. When it comes to school mass shootings specifically [ source ]:

            • 67% are white
            • 100% are male (95% according to a different source)
            • “Severe mental illness (e.g., psychosis) was absent in the majority of perpetrators; when present, psychotic symptoms are more associated with mass murders in academic settings involving means other than firearms”

            And with regard to school shootings generally:

            • 77% of the time, someone knew about their plans for the shooting ahead of time
            • more than half of K-12 shooters have a history of psychological problems, but the bigger issue is that nearly three quarters of the time, they had been being bullied or harassed in school
            • depending on the source, nearly half or more than half got the gun from home or a relative, often by stealing an unsecured or under-secured firearm
            • 91% of shootings were with a handgun

            If we could reduce bullying and do a better job at making students feel like they have value and matter, that would go a lot further toward reducing school shootings than anything involving mental illness (aside from, perhaps, efforts to reduce the stigma associated with it).

            Substance abuse - drugs, particularly those that are illegal, and alcohol - as well as poverty and inequality is much more strongly linked to gun violence.

            I’m not saying that we shouldn’t continue improving our available mental health resources (the majority of deaths from guns are by suicide, after all), but we shouldn’t use mental illness as a scapegoat.