- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
A WIRED investigation uncovered coordinates collected by a controversial data broker that reveal sensitive information about visitors to an island once owned by Epstein, the notorious sex offender.
Archived version: https://archive.ph/tBv7z
Is this a long winded warning that this information is out there? They name no names, just infer, and then say that we need our privacy at the end. Am I wrong that this seems like a call to arms so that people know how to fight this information coming out?
Yeah, where’s the beef? If they have location data of the pedophiles can’t they share what they have? With the police as well? I got the same feeling you did… Trying to play devil’s advocate, the most charitable reason i can think of that they’re being so coy is the location data implicates people with the power to crush them.
I’m sure people who sued Epstein, Prince Andrew, etc., would have wanted those locations. If they could prove they were both there during that time, a lot of litigation would have been settled much faster. Also, maybe (I doubt it) some of those people could have been stopped.
Isn’t their business model to sell this shit? Probably looking for the highest bidder. Maybe we can crowdsource the funds?
Nah the calls for privacy is because the same cell data that tracks the pedophiles also contains data that could track the victims.
It’s not just perpetrators though.
A lot of those victims want corroboration though. Also, they could at least release the known repeat attendees.
have you seen quotesare you sure that the victims would want/need this corroboration? (Not trying to argue, just asking) If I’m understanding this correctly bad actors could use this to identify victims and “epstein” em, so i can see why Lisa Bloom would be worried.Edit: i phrased that poorly