• frezik@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    There’s also questions around the game industry as a whole. I think the recent layoffs at major companies aren’t just another cycle, but systemic. The market no longer bears production of giant games with crazy graphics that cost $70 and have a bunch of DLC and gambling mechanics attached.

    Games won’t go away, but they’ll play fine on something like the Steam Deck, Switch 2, or modest gaming PC. What would high end console hardware bring to the table anymore?

    • Hypx@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Graphics are no longer a major selling point in most cases. Most people would be fine with a good game that works and isn’t saddle with microtransactions, even if it means it will look somewhat worse.

      • P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Consoles themselves are a source of microtransactions. Just look at how much money you have to spend to have online play.

        Guess how much it costs on Steam. Come on… guess!

      • ashok36@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        I wouldn’t say graphics have zero bearing for sales but the scales have definitely tipped towards gameplay over the last several years. Minecraft added rtx graphics and the mass majority of people, even with rtx capable cards, just yawned.

        Digital game sales, outside of sports titles, are pushed by streaming engagement and riding coat tails of previous games. Look at the recent history and it’s pretty obvious.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        I’m saying the Switch 2 does not need power, because nothing will be pushing graphics so hard anymore.

        • Pika@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          the switch 2 IMO needs a power upgrade for sure, my switch 1 struggled to actually play higher ended games, and the actual graphic quality on those games wern’t bad but not the great either.

          Nintendon't Rant

          That being said, I decided recently that Nintendon’t is a company that doesn’t need my money, between the actively hostile acts to its fan generated content with the shut down of third party non-profit games, it’s prosecution of Gary Bowser(which was the extent of charging a sales associate for the entire companies fraud) and it’s downright abusive treatment of the right to repair and archival/emulation communities. They are basically the Apple of the game development world. I won’t spend money on their stuff anymore.

        • Squizzy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Current switch needs to stream current and last gen games, they will still need power.

          • frezik@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Switch 2 is likely to be around the power level of a PS4, which is good enough for this hypothetical.