• discusseded@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Appx is locked down tight on purpose. It’s built to be a more secure application platform than exe.

    Not saying it’s right and you should have to deal, but that’s why.

    Editing to say I also went Linux last year and I love it far too much to ever go back to Windows. Flatpaks are similar to AppX but at least you can customize the permissions for them. Still I find them to be a bit of a pain to use for some apps.

    • Thenonymous Rexius@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      I just feel there is a glaring flaw in Appx, in that if you ever need to try and troubleshoot a piece of software or need to access the application folder in anyway for any reason, it’s effectively blackwalls it. Or at least, it’s not worth the amount of effort and compromise required to bypass it.

      Flatpaks are way better than Snaps, but I feel AppImage’s do a much better job of modularizing executables and their libraries into an easy to run package. I just wish there was a decent piece of software for management of installation of them.

      I use Pop_os on my main computer and recently have been getting back into NixOS and been working on writing a full configuration file for it.

      • discusseded@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I hear a lot about those distros around here. I recently settled on openSUSE Tumbleweed after having used Fedora and ZorinOS for a while. It’s so good, I haven’t thought about switching to anything else. Manjaro, Pop_os, and NixOS are on my list if that ever changes.

        I like AppImage a lot and I wonder why that didn’t take off like Flatpak did. A timing issue, perhaps?