Employees say they weren’t adequately warned about the brutality of some of the text and images they would be tasked with reviewing, and were offered no or inadequate psychological support. Workers were paid between $1.46 and $3.74 an hour, according to a Sama spokesperson.

  • ReCursing@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    tools to strip the best parts of humanity away from us so that AI can do creative activities like poetry and art

    Yeah that’s a bullshit take on AI

    • davehtaylor@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 year ago

      But that’s exactly what’s happening. Bloodsucking capitalists have decided that AI is a cheaper option than paying people a living wage, so creatives are losing their jobs.

      Instead of actually learning how to create art, shitbag grifters claim theyre “taking the power back from creatives” and doing nothing but stealing from actual creatives to make some sort of soulless synthesis, leaving actual creatives high and dry. For just one example, look at how many publishing outlets have stopped taking submissions because of the overwhelming flood of AI spam.

      All the while people are out here trying to make ends meet and are being forced into shitty, low paid jobs or gig work

      • Ringmasterincestuous
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think he/she was referring to the sole purpose of AI being developed is to create an additional subscription model that serves both ads and bullshit, locked to infrastructure of google or metas choice.

      • ReCursing@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Your complaint here is entirely with capitalism and has nothing to do with AI. It’s a legitimate concern, but it;s fart larger problem than new ways of making pictures. Aim your opprobrium at the correct targets

      • ReCursing@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        There’s nothing to elaborate on. It’s a stupid position put about by luddites and perpetuated by people with no understanding of the subject. It’s so not on target it’s not even wrong!

          • AfterthoughtC@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            The way AI advertisers constantly call others not on board Luddites reminds me of what somebody said on badly written magic systems in fiction. It was something like they focus more on making the most complex system rather than actually asking if it will add to the story. Then when the story fails to reach an audience these authors confuse the apathy with real life anti-intellectualism.

        • The Cuuuuube@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m a DevOps engineer. I work with big technology every day. I am very definitively not a Luddite. But the way the capitalists controlling our economy view and want to use AI is harmful to us, the lower and middle classes. I’m not sure which part of my view is so stupid that it enters into psuedoscience, leading me to not even being wrong

            • The Cuuuuube@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              1 year ago

              I could not make it any clearer I think the root cause is capitalism. That you’re putting the focus elsewhere is exhausting

              • ReCursing@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                No I agree. Keep going… Why are you therefore daemonising AI rather than focusing your ire where it belongs?

                • The Cuuuuube@beehaw.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I’m not demonizing AI. I’m demonizing OpenAI, the shitty company. I’m demonizing CEOs and publishing executives who think they can pass off an inferior product vomited out by a robot record scratching the entire history of human creativity while we get stuck doing bullshit jobs for Uber, DoorDash, Fiverr, and the rest.

                  You think I have a position on AI that I don’t and it’s exhausting repetitively explaining to you that I don’t think AI is the problem, I think capitalism is. What part of what I am saying is not clear? Why do you want to treat me like a moron luddite for something I don’t believe and didn’t say? I’m more and more getting the impression that you and I are on the same page about this but you’re inserting a position onto me I do not hold.

                  That’s why I said this is exhausting. In fact you’re exhausting. In fact, I feel like I’m being a jerk and I’m starting to think you’re a jerk