• Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 year ago

    they had me work 9-5 most days, and deploys started at 11pm but were on weekends. It sucks that we were salary and didn’t get comp time for the late nights, but we were salary on the days when there wasn’t much to do too, so it kinda balanced out. Til they decided that they were gonna switch deploys to Tuesday night. So I worked 9-5, came back in at 11, was supposed to be done at 5am and then sleep til 9, but the deploy went over, and we ended up not getting off of the deploy call till about 5pm the next day. For those of you keeping score at home, that’s 24 hours out of 30 spent at work. There was no comp time, there was no “attaboy!”, there was no talk of changing the way we do deploys, or having a handoff team available if they run long again. The next two deploys were someone else’s responsibility, but they also went long. Once It seemed to be that this was just how things are, I started looking. They had the nerve to say they were “shocked” when I handed in my notice.

    • HankScorpio
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is wild to me. I’m on salary. But paid by the minute. We almost never work our full 152 hours per 4 week cycle, usually 130-140 hours. We do anywhere from 4-11 hour shifts. We are rostered for service calls, if any adjustments are made to our shift, the entire shift will be paid overtime @ 1.7 (and not counted towards monthly cycle) if we go over our 152 hours we are paid overtime rate by the minute. And if we reach 11 hours on a shift we are not allowed to do any work or drive any vehicles, we have to call a taxi or get another crew to take us home.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Excuse me, but “full time” is 120 hours in 4 weeks. What’s this 130-140 bullshit, let alone 152?

        You’re getting screwed even in what you intended to be an example of a better workplace!

        Edit: I can’t math gud.

        • Longpork_afficianado@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          40 hours per week, the standard of “full time” in most places, equates to 160 hours per four weeks. 152 hours is the equivalent of a 38 hour week…

        • HankScorpio
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          You seem salty. What do you do for work? Do you love it? How much do you make?

      • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        yeah we were on salary and if you went over 40 in a week then you went over. I ended up leaving for a job that pays about 15% more, has unlimited PTO, full WFH when this job was hybrid and I haven’t put in more than about 35 hours in a week since then