mr_MADAFAKA@lemmy.ml to Steam@lemmy.ml · 8 months agoTim Sweeney emailed Gabe Newell calling Valve 'you assholes' over Steam policies, to which Valve's COO replied internally 'you mad bro?'www.pcgamer.comexternal-linkmessage-square194fedilinkarrow-up1587arrow-down128cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1559arrow-down1external-linkTim Sweeney emailed Gabe Newell calling Valve 'you assholes' over Steam policies, to which Valve's COO replied internally 'you mad bro?'www.pcgamer.commr_MADAFAKA@lemmy.ml to Steam@lemmy.ml · 8 months agomessage-square194fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down3·edit-28 months agoI think Steam’s cut should probably be something like 0.05 * (log(x) + 1) where x is number of copies sold.
minus-squareCabunach@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·8 months agoYou mean that games need to have 100 000 copies sold to get to the 30% cut?
minus-squareArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up9arrow-down1·8 months agoYes. It would mean that small indie games with low sales wouldn’t be hit as hard by Steam taking a cut, and huge hits that sell millions of copies would help subsidize this.
I think Steam’s cut should probably be something like
0.05 * (log(x) + 1)where x is number of copies sold.You mean that games need to have 100 000 copies sold to get to the 30% cut?
Yes. It would mean that small indie games with low sales wouldn’t be hit as hard by Steam taking a cut, and huge hits that sell millions of copies would help subsidize this.