Instagram reel transcript: “So you know how autistic people just talk and we literally mean like exactly what we say?”

“So like I realized that when I’m talking to a neurotypical person, even when I’m saying exactly what I’m saying, they’re looking for like, the meeting underneath it, which is nothing.”

“So the other day at work…I had a feedback session and one of the things they told me was that my communication wasn’t clear… And their example was I asked ‘What is so-and-so’s job?’ And she said, 'I knew exactly what you meant. I knew that you meant, 'She’s not pulling her weight. Why is she on the team? Why haven’t you fired her yet?”

“And I was like, hold up. I asked about her job was because I didn’t know what her job was and I wanted you to tell me what her job was. And she was like, ‘Oh. Well, that wasn’t clear and you should really give more context when you ask a question.’ And I was like, 'Okay…?? so…'I don’t know what her job is…What is… her… job?”

  • DirigibleProtein
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Say what you mean and mean what you say”. Why is that so difficult for normies to understand?

  • Deestan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 year ago

    While more manageable by NT people, I think this is clearly a toxic workplace where people are taught to fear their work can’t stand up to scrutiny. So anything that even counts as looking directly at their work is a threat, and any communication must be scrutinized for hidden threats.

  • Lvxferre@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Literally what even are the neurotypicals doing

    Conversational implicatures. It’s basically the reason why plenty people say something, when they mean something else.

    However what that coworker is doing is a bit beyond conversational implicatures, she’s reading too much into what Alyssa said. That’s clear because she then complained that Alyssa didn’t give her enough context - in other words, there was no context to implicate anything, and yet she still saw an implicature there. I call this a “ghost” implicature, dunno if there’s some actual name for that. But to keep it short, the coworker is likely the one to blame for the miscommunication, not Alyssa herself.

    • Match!!@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Excellent and clearly stated. Thank you for this new terminology and reference point about conversations!