• BirdEnjoyer@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    9 months ago

    This seems like such a wretched inevitably. I mean, I guess we’re living it with phones, but it seems so unnecessary with cars.

    Is there really no market for the same boring car, with minor efficiency tweaks, for, like, ever? I coulda lived with my 95’ Accord forever if the parts hadn’t been too expensive.

    Do es the market really not want that, or do the manufacturers prevent it from happening?

    Any Automancer please explain, I’m not car enough to understand.

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      9 months ago

      Selling your data is a new revenue stream for automakers, and as a practical matter, you can’t avoid it.

      • BirdEnjoyer@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Even before data sales, though, a baseline, universal car never happened. Was there never a market or was a market never allowed to form?

        Or perhaps the tech in a car really does advance faster than I understand? But then how would retro cars be street legal?

        • BakerBagel@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          9 months ago

          They aren’t as profitable as luxury cars. Ford stopped making sedans because their margins are so much larger on SUV’s and trucks. They keep eliminating the base trim model and making luxury versions the mew “standard” to keep making more and more money.

    • 0x0@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      Do es the market really not want that, or do the manufacturers prevent it from happening?

      Of course they don’t want that. Build-int obsolescence is a thing, has been for ages and not just in cars.