• rewarp@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    I owned a Kyocera DuraXT for a while. Lovely waterproof phone I frequently launched into walls and concrete whenever the iPhone crowd asked me why. Battery easily removable and replaceable. Flip phone. Able to make calls while drowning up to 5 metres underwater.

    Only reason I don’t use it anymore is I moved back to a country that doesn’t support CDMA. Would get another one immediately if it supports Signal.

    • Spzi@lemmy.click
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Lovely waterproof phone I frequently launched into walls and concrete whenever the iPhone crowd asked me why. Battery easily removable and replaceable. Flip phone.

      I understand it is possible to make. From my general understanding of physics and engineering, I assume it requires more effort to achieve both (replacable and resistant) than to just achieve one.

      So while I approve to have the option to have a replacable battery, I’m a bit worried forcing manufacturers to include that feature would raise the price, even for customers who don’t need it.

      • rewarp@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        My DuraXT cost me like USD70. It’s been done before with older stuff for dirt cheap. Plus waterproofing is not necessarily covering all ingress points. It includes a coating on the parts as well.

        That’s how I can read on my Kobo ereader, spill curry on it, and clean it off at the sink.

      • poVoq@slrpnk.netM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        This new EU legislation actually explicitly exempts phones and tablets if in turn the manufacturers give a certain lifetime guarantee for the battery or something like that (I need to re-read the details).