I’ve worked with some pretty rotten software, but management software is easily the most user unfriendly, so my vote goes to HPSM.

  • Ashy@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    When our company annoucned the switch to Teams I actually offered to pay for the slack licence out of my own pocket instead. But the boss insisted we need the onedrive integration or some shit and declined.

    • plz1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yeah that was BS. Boss was told to say anything other than “to save money”. That’s the entire value prop for Teams.

        • plz1@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          I know, but the rollout playbook is to pump up the Office integrations, not showcase the cost savings. Because normal end users don’t care.

          • vithigar@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 months ago

            And then people don’t even use the office integrations, which are pretty much the only good thing Teams has. The integration of PowerPoint with meetings is actually pretty good, but the number of presentations I’ve sat through where someone just screen shared their PowerPoint window is absurd.

            • plz1@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              They can detect that too, so Microsoft “could” automate the better way.