• Hugohase@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    Best time to build a reactor is never. Better to use the fuckton of money for cheaper and better renewables…

    • Ooops@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      But then you would need another excuse in ~2 decades but having build not enough expensive nuclear power, still struggling to get the ones in production finished and still burning fossil fuels…

      And we all know that destroying the planet for profits is the actual goal here.

      The exact same people spending huge sums on deying climate change for decades are now paying for “it’s all too late and we are doomed anyway, so why try to do anything” and “nuclear power, especially future designs far from actually being production ready, will safe us” messaging.

    • drknowledge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Hydro and wind kill more people per terawatt hour. That leaves solar (and possibly tidal as that development ramps up). Putting all your eggs in just one form of renewables (solar) would be an insane risk. Base loads need to be addressed in order to phase out the fossil fuels.

      There are more options with modern reactor designs. Small modular reactors can be built and brought online cheaper and faster than previous designs. That would allow a faster ROI (reducing fossil fuel usage faster).

      Solar, wind, tidal and nuclear should be scaled simultaneously to reach our goals and not think it’s just one or the other.

        • drknowledge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Wind IS acceptable. Read the last paragraph. The first part of the comment is merely addressing the people that suggest solar only as it’s the only source with less attributed deaths per terawatt hour. I’m also partial to the Norwegian hydro model.