The approval rating of the nation’s highest court stands at 40 per cent, according to a new poll

The Supreme Court’s approval rating has plunged to one of its lowest levels yet ahead of a ruling on Donald Trump’s eligibility to run for president.

The approval rating of the nation’s highest court stands at 40 per cent, according to the latest poll released by Marquette Law School on Wednesday.

The latest numbers rival only those of July 2022, when only 38 per cent of US adults said they approved of the Supreme Court and 61 per cent disapproved – just after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v Wade.

    • beardown@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Maybe I see Roberts as a centrist because he puts the Court’s legitimacy ahead of his personal politics.

      To dumb it down further It’s really the difference between lawful evil and neutral evil or chaotic evil. Or the difference between longtermism and shortermism.

      Roberts wants ultimate outcomes that are as radically right wing as those desired by Alito. The difference is that Alito wants those outcome to occur now. Roberts wants those outcomes to happen gradually over decades. This is because Roberts is afraid of blowback; Alito is aware of this argument, but he believes that the power of the Supreme Court and the Republican Party has been consolidated so absolutely that such fears of blowback are unreasonable and illusory.

      The metaphor of boiling the frog gradually over a long period Vs dropping the frog into already boiling water is apt. You place a frog into a pot of room temperature water and then gradually turn up the heat until it is boiling. This prevents the frog from jumping out of the pot, something it physically could do at any time, because it doesn’t perceive the graduality of the temperature changes. Alito et al understand the wisdom of slowly boiling the frog; they just believe that the cooking pot we are using is miles deep such that it would be impossible for any frog to jump out - and that we have also chained on a heavy lid to the pot that would also prevent frogs from escaping. We are that frog, and Alito believes that the GOP has fully constructed that enormous pot and lid. Under that worldview, there is no meaningful negative consequence for SCOTUS making drastic revisionist decisions whenever they want. The decisions may radically overturn precedent, but they are nonetheless unchallengeable.

      It is our job as citizens to prove Alito wrong. If we don’t then our standard of living will rapidly deteriorate even more radically than it already has since 1981. SCOTUS will remake the United States completely, and make it an absolute dictatorship of the billionaire. That must be opposed

      • aesthelete@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        The metaphor of boiling the frog gradually over a long period Vs dropping the frog into already boiling water is apt. You place a frog into a pot of room temperature water and then gradually turn up the heat until it is boiling. This prevents the frog from jumping out of the pot, something it physically could do at any time, because it doesn’t perceive the graduality of the temperature changes.

        Ima let you finish, but they’ve done this experiment and the frog jumps out. It also becomes increasingly active as the temperature rises.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boiling_frog

        And frogs are cool so I get sick of the “frog boiling” slander, though I understand the metaphor.

        • beardown@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          I understand that it isn’t what is done when cooking frogs. It’s a metaphor, and i used it only for its value of analogy

          • DAMunzy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            You were literally like a bull in a china shop with your response.

            You were respectful and answered nicely. See Myth Busters. 😉

            • beardown@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              You were literally like a bull in a china shop with your response.

              You were respectful and answered nicely

              What?